Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSchneidhofer, Petra
dc.contributor.authorTonning, Christer
dc.contributor.authorCannell, Rebecca J S
dc.contributor.authorNau, Erich
dc.contributor.authorHinterleitner, Alois
dc.contributor.authorVerhoeven, Geert
dc.contributor.authorGustavsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorPaasche, Knut
dc.contributor.authorNeubauer, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorGansum, Terje
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-16T13:31:37Z
dc.date.available2023-03-16T13:31:37Z
dc.date.created2022-08-02T18:46:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3058833
dc.description.abstractThe Borre Monitoring Project investigated how environmental factors, in particular, precipitation and soil moisture variation as well as different soil and sediment types, affect the quality of GPR data collected for archaeological purposes. To study these questions, regular GPR surveys were conducted over a period of 14 months across a test area covering a hall building at the Iron and Viking Age site of Borre in Norway. In order to obtain in situ measurements of environmental factors relevant for electromagnetic wave propagation including volumetric water content, bulk electrical conductivity, ground temperature, and precipitation, three monitoring stations were erected at the test site. Soil and sediment samples taken from the profiles at the respective monitoring stations were analysed to gain a basic description of their physical and chemical properties. Twelve GPR surveys were conducted roughly once a month between August 2016 and September 2017 and the results clearly indicated differences in the quality of the data collected. To better understand the underlying causes for this variation, GPR data were compared against and integrated with the in situ measurements gathered using the monitoring stations. The results of this analysis emphasised the benefit of dry conditions, which, if prevailing over a longer period of time, proved to generate GPR data of the highest quality. Seasonality could not be attested; instead, data quality was governed by small-scale weather patterns, where the time and intensity of rainfall events prior to the surveys as well as sudden changes in air temperature played a decisive role. While the results of this study are only valid for sites with similar settings such as Borre, they emphasise the importance of considering the environmental factors during all stages of a GPR survey and highlight the need for further studies investigating other settings.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Influence of Environmental Factors on the Quality of GPR Data: The Borre Monitoring Projecten_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/14/3289
dc.subjectArkeologisk geofysikken_US
dc.subjectArchaeological geophysicsen_US
dc.titleThe Influence of Environmental Factors on the Quality of GPR Data: The Borre Monitoring Projecten_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Influence of Environmental Factors on the Quality of GPR Data: The Borre Monitoring Projecten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Annen arkeologi: 099en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Other subjects within archaeology: 099en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.issue14en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs14143289
dc.identifier.cristin2040760
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel