Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGustavsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorStamnes, Arne Anderson
dc.contributor.authorFretheim, Silje Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorGjerpe, Lars Erik
dc.contributor.authorNau, Erich
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T13:21:57Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T13:21:57Z
dc.date.created2020-04-29T19:20:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2722221
dc.description.abstractThe use of large-scale, high-resolution ground-penetrating radar surveys has increasingly become a part of Norwegian cultural heritage management as a complementary method to trial trenching surveys to detect and delineate archaeological sites. The aim of this article is to collect, interpret and compare large-scale, high-resolution ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey data with results from trial trenching and subsequent large-scale excavations, and to extract descriptive and spatial statistics on detection rates and precision for both evaluation methods. This, in turn, is used to assess the advantages and disadvantages of both conventional, intrusive methods and large-scale GPR surveys. Neither method proved to be flawless, and while the trial trenching had a better overall detection rate, organic and charcoal rich features were nearly just as easily detected by both methods. Similarly, the spatial representability was similar, even though the total detection rates were lower with the GPR. This can be used as an argument in advance of integrating full-coverage GPR results into a site evaluation scheme, preferably in combination with other methods. Overall, these analyses have highlighted drawbacks and possibilities in both methods that are important contributions in understanding how to use them and integrate them in future site evaluations.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/9/1408
dc.titleThe Effectiveness of Large-Scale, High-Resolution Ground-Penetrating Radar Surveys and Trial Trenching for Archaeological Site Evaluations—A Comparative Study from Two Sites in Norway
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.volume12
dc.source.journalRemote Sensing
dc.source.issue19
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091408
dc.identifier.cristin1808716
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel