Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCusack, Jeremy J.
dc.contributor.authorDuthie, Brad
dc.contributor.authorRakotonarivo, Sarobidy
dc.contributor.authorPozo, Rocio A.
dc.contributor.authorMason, Tom H. E.
dc.contributor.authorMånsson, Johan
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Lovisa
dc.contributor.authorTombre, Ingunn M.
dc.contributor.authorEythórsson, Einar
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorTulloch, Ayesha
dc.contributor.authorHearn, Richard D.
dc.contributor.authorRedpath, Steve
dc.contributor.authorBunnefeld, Nils
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-15T09:52:29Z
dc.date.available2019-02-15T09:52:29Z
dc.date.created2018-03-15T14:07:15Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationConservation Letters. 2019, 12, e12450nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1755-263X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585651
dc.description.abstractThe management of conflicts between wildlife conservation and agricultural practices often involves the implementation of strategies aimed at reducing the cost of wildlife impacts on crops. Vital to the success of these strategies is the perception that changes in management efforts are synchronised relative to changes in impact levels, yet this expectation is never evaluated. We assess the level of synchrony between time series of population counts and management effort in the context of conflicts between agriculture and five populations of large grazing birds in northern Europe. We reveal inconsistent patterns of synchrony and asynchrony between changes in population counts and impact management effort relating to population harvesting, monetary payments or scaring practices. This variation is likely due to differing management aims, the existence of lags between management decisions and population monitoring, and the inconsistent use of predictive models across case studies. Overall, our findings highlight the need for more adaptive and timely responses of management to changes in target species numbers so as not to unexpectedly increase social conflicts and jeopardise the status of wildlife populations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcompensationnb_NO
dc.subjectconflictnb_NO
dc.subjectcranenb_NO
dc.subjectgoosenb_NO
dc.subjectharvestnb_NO
dc.subjectmanagementnb_NO
dc.subjectpopulation countnb_NO
dc.subjectscaringnb_NO
dc.subjecttime seriesnb_NO
dc.titleTime series analysis reveals synchrony and asynchrony between conflict management effort and increasing large grazing bird populations in northern Europenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2018 The Authors.nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber11nb_NO
dc.source.volume12nb_NO
dc.source.journalConservation Lettersnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/conl.12450
dc.identifier.cristin1573172
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/679651 (ConFooBio)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7530,45,0,0
cristin.unitnameNordområdeavdelingen
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal